| /qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/ |
| H A D | 283 | 985cac8f Thu May 06 14:13:57 GMT 2021 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> blockjob: drop BlockJob.blk field
It's unused now (except for permission handling)[*]. The only reasonable
user of it was block-stream job, recently updated to use own blk. And
other block jobs prefer to use own source node related objects.
So, the arguments of dropping the field are:
- block jobs prefer not to use it
- block jobs usually has more then one node to operate on, and better
to operate symmetrically (for example has both source and target
blk's in specific block-job state structure)
*: BlockJob.blk is used to keep some permissions. We simply move
permissions to block-job child created in block_job_create() together
with blk.
In mirror, we just should not care anymore about restoring state of
blk. Most probably this code could be dropped long ago, after dropping
bs->job pointer. Now it finally goes away together with BlockJob.blk
itself.
iotest 141 output is updated, as "bdrv_has_blk(bs)" check in
qmp_blockdev_del() doesn't fail (we don't have blk now). Still, new
error message looks even better.
In iotest 283 we need to add a job id, otherwise "Invalid job ID"
happens now earlier than permission check (as permissions moved from
blk to block-job node).
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikita Lapshin <nikita.lapshin@virtuozzo.com>
|
| H A D | 283.out | 985cac8f Thu May 06 14:13:57 GMT 2021 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> blockjob: drop BlockJob.blk field
It's unused now (except for permission handling)[*]. The only reasonable
user of it was block-stream job, recently updated to use own blk. And
other block jobs prefer to use own source node related objects.
So, the arguments of dropping the field are:
- block jobs prefer not to use it
- block jobs usually has more then one node to operate on, and better
to operate symmetrically (for example has both source and target
blk's in specific block-job state structure)
*: BlockJob.blk is used to keep some permissions. We simply move
permissions to block-job child created in block_job_create() together
with blk.
In mirror, we just should not care anymore about restoring state of
blk. Most probably this code could be dropped long ago, after dropping
bs->job pointer. Now it finally goes away together with BlockJob.blk
itself.
iotest 141 output is updated, as "bdrv_has_blk(bs)" check in
qmp_blockdev_del() doesn't fail (we don't have blk now). Still, new
error message looks even better.
In iotest 283 we need to add a job id, otherwise "Invalid job ID"
happens now earlier than permission check (as permissions moved from
blk to block-job node).
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikita Lapshin <nikita.lapshin@virtuozzo.com>
|
| H A D | 141.out | 985cac8f Thu May 06 14:13:57 GMT 2021 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> blockjob: drop BlockJob.blk field
It's unused now (except for permission handling)[*]. The only reasonable
user of it was block-stream job, recently updated to use own blk. And
other block jobs prefer to use own source node related objects.
So, the arguments of dropping the field are:
- block jobs prefer not to use it
- block jobs usually has more then one node to operate on, and better
to operate symmetrically (for example has both source and target
blk's in specific block-job state structure)
*: BlockJob.blk is used to keep some permissions. We simply move
permissions to block-job child created in block_job_create() together
with blk.
In mirror, we just should not care anymore about restoring state of
blk. Most probably this code could be dropped long ago, after dropping
bs->job pointer. Now it finally goes away together with BlockJob.blk
itself.
iotest 141 output is updated, as "bdrv_has_blk(bs)" check in
qmp_blockdev_del() doesn't fail (we don't have blk now). Still, new
error message looks even better.
In iotest 283 we need to add a job id, otherwise "Invalid job ID"
happens now earlier than permission check (as permissions moved from
blk to block-job node).
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikita Lapshin <nikita.lapshin@virtuozzo.com>
|
| /qemu/include/block/ |
| H A D | blockjob.h | 985cac8f Thu May 06 14:13:57 GMT 2021 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> blockjob: drop BlockJob.blk field
It's unused now (except for permission handling)[*]. The only reasonable
user of it was block-stream job, recently updated to use own blk. And
other block jobs prefer to use own source node related objects.
So, the arguments of dropping the field are:
- block jobs prefer not to use it
- block jobs usually has more then one node to operate on, and better
to operate symmetrically (for example has both source and target
blk's in specific block-job state structure)
*: BlockJob.blk is used to keep some permissions. We simply move
permissions to block-job child created in block_job_create() together
with blk.
In mirror, we just should not care anymore about restoring state of
blk. Most probably this code could be dropped long ago, after dropping
bs->job pointer. Now it finally goes away together with BlockJob.blk
itself.
iotest 141 output is updated, as "bdrv_has_blk(bs)" check in
qmp_blockdev_del() doesn't fail (we don't have blk now). Still, new
error message looks even better.
In iotest 283 we need to add a job id, otherwise "Invalid job ID"
happens now earlier than permission check (as permissions moved from
blk to block-job node).
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikita Lapshin <nikita.lapshin@virtuozzo.com>
|
| /qemu/ |
| H A D | blockjob.c | 985cac8f Thu May 06 14:13:57 GMT 2021 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> blockjob: drop BlockJob.blk field
It's unused now (except for permission handling)[*]. The only reasonable
user of it was block-stream job, recently updated to use own blk. And
other block jobs prefer to use own source node related objects.
So, the arguments of dropping the field are:
- block jobs prefer not to use it
- block jobs usually has more then one node to operate on, and better
to operate symmetrically (for example has both source and target
blk's in specific block-job state structure)
*: BlockJob.blk is used to keep some permissions. We simply move
permissions to block-job child created in block_job_create() together
with blk.
In mirror, we just should not care anymore about restoring state of
blk. Most probably this code could be dropped long ago, after dropping
bs->job pointer. Now it finally goes away together with BlockJob.blk
itself.
iotest 141 output is updated, as "bdrv_has_blk(bs)" check in
qmp_blockdev_del() doesn't fail (we don't have blk now). Still, new
error message looks even better.
In iotest 283 we need to add a job id, otherwise "Invalid job ID"
happens now earlier than permission check (as permissions moved from
blk to block-job node).
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikita Lapshin <nikita.lapshin@virtuozzo.com>
|
| /qemu/block/ |
| H A D | mirror.c | 985cac8f Thu May 06 14:13:57 GMT 2021 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> blockjob: drop BlockJob.blk field
It's unused now (except for permission handling)[*]. The only reasonable
user of it was block-stream job, recently updated to use own blk. And
other block jobs prefer to use own source node related objects.
So, the arguments of dropping the field are:
- block jobs prefer not to use it
- block jobs usually has more then one node to operate on, and better
to operate symmetrically (for example has both source and target
blk's in specific block-job state structure)
*: BlockJob.blk is used to keep some permissions. We simply move
permissions to block-job child created in block_job_create() together
with blk.
In mirror, we just should not care anymore about restoring state of
blk. Most probably this code could be dropped long ago, after dropping
bs->job pointer. Now it finally goes away together with BlockJob.blk
itself.
iotest 141 output is updated, as "bdrv_has_blk(bs)" check in
qmp_blockdev_del() doesn't fail (we don't have blk now). Still, new
error message looks even better.
In iotest 283 we need to add a job id, otherwise "Invalid job ID"
happens now earlier than permission check (as permissions moved from
blk to block-job node).
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikita Lapshin <nikita.lapshin@virtuozzo.com>
|